Permit GraphShortlistSan Francisco building permits since 2000

Block 3729, lot 075

774 Tehama St

City’s use
Industrial
Built
1985
Stories
2
Building
3,920 sq ft
Lot
1,960 sq ft
Zoning
SLR
Construction type
D

From the assessor's latest secured roll, which can lag recent work. Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map

Permits filed here

2 permits filed for this property since 2000.

CompletedIn progressNever finaledExpired or cancelled
FiledOutcomeAddressContractorWork described on the permitDeclared cost
Jul 17, 2026In progress
issued Jul 2026
774 Tehama StD.F.P.F Corp Dba Fine Line Constructionrevision to pa# 202412307532: relocate toilet room from 1st floor to 2nd floor and add bathtub. lengthen kitchenette. no change in quantity of light fixtures.
Details
Permit
202607175171
Status
issued
Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Permit issued
Jul 17, 2026
Address
774 Tehama St

revision to pa# 202412307532: relocate toilet room from 1st floor to 2nd floor and add bathtub. lengthen kitchenette. no change in quantity of light fixtures.

Open the permit page

Apr 19, 2025In progress
issued Apr 2026
774 Tehama StD.F.P.F Corp Dba Fine Line Constructiondemo and reconstruction of second story and restrooms in response to the following notice of violations:nov#'s: 202425066, 202425811, and 202425824.scope of work is interior only.
Details
Permit
202412307532
Status
issued
Filed
Apr 19, 2025
Permit issued
Apr 8, 2026
Declared cost
$90,000
Address
774 Tehama St

demo and reconstruction of second story and restrooms in response to the following notice of violations:nov#'s: 202425066, 202425811, and 202425824.scope of work is interior only.

Open the permit page

$90,000

Who worked here

Everyone with a license on these permits, by role, with how many permits each is on.

Contractors
D.F.P.F Corp Dba Fine Line Construction (2)
Architects
Austen Diliberto, Austenboyd Dilberto
Engineers
Lou Xiao

Find contractors for work like this

Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.