Permit GraphShortlistSan Francisco building permits since 2000

Block 4096, lot 057

863 De Haro St

The city’s assessor roll has no record for this parcel.

Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map

Permits filed here

3 permits filed for this property since 2000.

CompletedIn progressNever finaledExpired or cancelled
FiledOutcomeAddressContractorWork described on the permitDeclared cost
Dec 23, 2010Never finaled
issued Mar 2011, no final
863 De Haro StD M Pauletich & Sons Contructionconstruct new concrete stairway leading down to crawl space at rear yard. construct new cmu firewall at rear yard
Details
Permit
201012237326
Status
issued
Filed
Dec 23, 2010
Permit issued
Mar 16, 2011
Declared cost
$6,200
Address
863 De Haro St

construct new concrete stairway leading down to crawl space at rear yard. construct new cmu firewall at rear yard

Open the permit page

$6,200
Feb 4, 2002Expired or cancelled
expired Sep 2003
863 De Haro Streference permit app#200105048436. rep proposed 1 hr window construction with new 45 min. window ass
Details
Permit
200202048424
Status
expired
Filed
Feb 4, 2002
Permit issued
May 21, 2002
Address
863 De Haro St

reference permit app#200105048436. rep proposed 1 hr window construction with new 45 min. window ass

Open the permit page

May 4, 2001Completed
final sign-off Feb 2002
863 De Haro Stprovide 1-hr const to (e)hse at relocated side property line;rmve utility rm at rear corner
Details
Permit
200105048436
Status
complete
Filed
May 4, 2001
Permit issued
Dec 17, 2001
Final sign-off
Feb 12, 2002
Declared cost
$25,000
Address
863 De Haro St

provide 1-hr const to (e)hse at relocated side property line;rmve utility rm at rear corner

Open the permit page

$25,000

Who worked here

Everyone with a license on these permits, by role, with how many permits each is on.

Contractors
D M Pauletich & Sons Contruction

Find contractors for work like this

Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.