Block 3587, lot 037
553 Dolores St
The city’s assessor roll has no record for this parcel.
Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map
Permits filed here
5 permits filed for this property since 2000.
| Filed | Outcome | Address | Contractor | Work described on the permit | Declared cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | Completed final sign-off Jun 2006 | 553 Dolores St | Terence Mcmahon Construction | cover exiting redwood siding with 4x8 sheet siding in lightwell at side of building, not visible from street.Details
cover exiting redwood siding with 4x8 sheet siding in lightwell at side of building, not visible from street. | $10,000 |
| May 3, 2006 | Completed final sign-off Jun 2006 | 553 Dolores St | Terence Mcmahon Construction | comply with physical inspection report 3r-4403.Details
comply with physical inspection report 3r-4403. | $10,000 |
| Feb 23, 2004 | Completed final sign-off Jan 2006 | 555 Dolores St | Diverse Inspection Svcs | repair rear fence, install non-structural lattice (10 ft height limit)Details
repair rear fence, install non-structural lattice (10 ft height limit) | $1,000 |
| Feb 17, 2004 | Expired or cancelled expired Jan 2007 | 553 Dolores St | Alameda Construciton | add braces at landings, two levels involvedDetails
add braces at landings, two levels involved | $1,000 |
| Jul 16, 2001 | Completed final sign-off Sep 2001 | 557 Dolores St | Payesko Constructioin Inc | remodel bathrom water closet new drywall tile wiring plumbing same fixtures to remain repair fenceDetails
remodel bathrom water closet new drywall tile wiring plumbing same fixtures to remain repair fence | $6,000 |
Who worked here
Everyone with a license on these permits, by role, with how many permits each is on.
- Contractors
- Terence Mcmahon Construction (2), Alameda Construciton, Diverse Inspection Svcs, Payesko Constructioin Inc
Find contractors for work like this
Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.