Permit GraphShortlistSan Francisco building permits since 2000

Block 0852, lot 009

178 Haight St

The city’s assessor roll has no record for this parcel.

Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map

Permits filed here

4 permits filed for this property since 2000.

CompletedIn progressNever finaledExpired or cancelled
FiledOutcomeAddressContractorWork described on the permitDeclared cost
Aug 1, 2011Never finaled
issued Aug 2011, no final
178 Haight Ststreet space
Details
Permit
M274088
Status
issued
Filed
Aug 1, 2011
Permit issued
Aug 1, 2011
Address
178 Haight St

street space

Open the permit page

Nov 2, 2010Completed
final sign-off Dec 2010
176 Haight StHough Constructioninterior remodel. creat a new den with half-bath and w/d in ground floor storage area. remove (e) brick chimney
Details
Permit
201011024196
Status
complete
Filed
Nov 2, 2010
Permit issued
Nov 4, 2010
Final sign-off
Dec 21, 2010
Declared cost
$55,000
Address
176 Haight St

interior remodel. creat a new den with half-bath and w/d in ground floor storage area. remove (e) brick chimney

Open the permit page

$55,000
Mar 31, 2010Completed
final sign-off Apr 2010
178 Haight Stcomply with physical inspection report #cc-5710
Details
Permit
201003319354
Status
complete
Filed
Mar 31, 2010
Permit issued
Mar 31, 2010
Final sign-off
Apr 22, 2010
Declared cost
$5,000
Address
178 Haight St

comply with physical inspection report #cc-5710

Open the permit page

$5,000
Jul 24, 2000Expired or cancelled
expired Jan 2001
178 Haight StWestco Roofing Co. Inc.reroofing
Details
Permit
200007245932
Status
expired
Filed
Jul 24, 2000
Permit issued
Jul 24, 2000
Declared cost
$13,000
Address
178 Haight St

reroofing

Open the permit page

$13,000

Who worked here

Everyone with a license on these permits, by role, with how many permits each is on.

Contractors
Hough Construction, Westco Roofing Co. Inc.

Find contractors for work like this

Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.