Permit GraphShortlistSan Francisco building permits since 2000

Block 0830, lot 012B

472 Oak St

The city’s assessor roll has no record for this parcel.

Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map

Permits filed here

4 permits filed for this property since 2000.

CompletedIn progressNever finaledExpired or cancelled
FiledOutcomeAddressContractorWork described on the permitDeclared cost
Aug 26, 2011Completed
final sign-off Sep 2011
472 Oak Stunit #474 oak-comply with report of physical inspection report #cc-5862
Details
Permit
201108263325
Status
complete
Filed
Aug 26, 2011
Permit issued
Aug 26, 2011
Final sign-off
Sep 27, 2011
Declared cost
$9,239
Address
472 Oak St

unit #474 oak-comply with report of physical inspection report #cc-5862

Open the permit page

$9,239
May 4, 2011Completed
final sign-off Sep 2011
472 Oak StSuperior Structuresto comply with physical inspection report cc-5862.
Details
Permit
201105045299
Status
complete
Filed
May 4, 2011
Permit issued
May 4, 2011
Final sign-off
Sep 27, 2011
Declared cost
$5,000
Address
472 Oak St

to comply with physical inspection report cc-5862.

Open the permit page

$5,000
Mar 15, 2011Completed
final sign-off Jun 2011
472 Oak StSuperior Structuresreplace area damage by fire to include sheetrock, framing, hvac, cope upgrades per inspector's request.
Details
Permit
201103152113
Status
complete
Filed
Mar 15, 2011
Permit issued
Mar 15, 2011
Final sign-off
Jun 10, 2011
Declared cost
$25,000
Address
472 Oak St

replace area damage by fire to include sheetrock, framing, hvac, cope upgrades per inspector's request.

Open the permit page

$25,000
May 21, 2004Never finaled
issued May 2004, no final
472 Oak StTri General Buildersreroofing
Details
Permit
200405214486
Status
issued
Filed
May 21, 2004
Permit issued
May 21, 2004
Declared cost
$7,000
Address
472 Oak St

reroofing

Open the permit page

$7,000

Find contractors for work like this

Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.