Permit GraphShortlistSan Francisco building permits since 2000

Block 0467A, lot 018

3467 Fillmore St

The city’s assessor roll has no record for this parcel.

Lot plans, zoning and planning history on the city’s Property Information Map

Permits filed here

3 permits filed for this property since 2000.

CompletedIn progressNever finaledExpired or cancelled
FiledOutcomeAddressContractorWork described on the permitDeclared cost
Aug 27, 2009Completed
final sign-off Oct 2009
3467 Fillmore StAshbury Gen Constructing & Engcomply with 3r report cc-5560, all items other than those requiring permit elec/plumbing including legalizing kitchen, remodel of 3467 fillmore st
Details
Permit
200908275677
Status
complete
Filed
Aug 27, 2009
Permit issued
Aug 27, 2009
Final sign-off
Oct 22, 2009
Declared cost
$25,919
Address
3467 Fillmore St

comply with 3r report cc-5560, all items other than those requiring permit elec/plumbing including legalizing kitchen, remodel of 3467 fillmore st

Open the permit page

$25,919
Jun 2, 2003Expired or cancelled
expired Jan 2006
3469 Fillmore StBest Roofing Const.reroofing
Details
Permit
200306026033
Status
expired
Filed
Jun 2, 2003
Permit issued
Jun 2, 2003
Declared cost
$7,500
Address
3469 Fillmore St

reroofing

Open the permit page

$7,500
Mar 15, 2002Completed
final sign-off Mar 2002
3467 Fillmore Stvoluntery bolting of wall sill plate to concrete foundation. install 3/4" threaded rod using epoxy w
Details
Permit
200203151543
Status
complete
Filed
Mar 15, 2002
Permit issued
Mar 15, 2002
Final sign-off
Mar 19, 2002
Declared cost
$2,500
Address
3467 Fillmore St

voluntery bolting of wall sill plate to concrete foundation. install 3/4" threaded rod using epoxy w

Open the permit page

$2,500

Who worked here

Everyone with a license on these permits, by role, with how many permits each is on.

Contractors
Ashbury Gen Constructing & Eng, Best Roofing Const.

Find contractors for work like this

Starts from the last permit filed here; change it to describe your own project. Results cover every building: the city does not class this parcel as single-family, two-family or apartments.